Dr Kimberly Turner is incompetent

tthe second two sentences after collateral information first of all she called the blog and article that's not an article it's a block she doesn't know the difference between an article and a block and she called it published. an article is published and then you are recognized in that community as a professional. a blog is also published but a blog is not the same as an article being published you're not considered published just because you're writing a blog. it is very concerning that this doctor does not know the difference between an article and a blog. as if the first mistake wasn't enough she writes this article discussed multiple people of the San Antonio Police department it discussed a lot more than that and for some reason this doctor is focused on the San Antonio Police department as if she is an sapd officer who is writing this for a fake doctor. she focused in on one of the postings of the blog that is about the DMV one of their police officers was placed working at the DMV and he was playing stupid games he started yelling screaming and changing my name at the DMV that individual is a huge problem for me and is traveling across the country and if they're going to focus in on that post about the DMV that means Dan Nelson and the little idiot Latino that was working at the DMV are on the road following me and it's likely that they've had hands on me as well. now she claims that my allegations in my blog include not opening criminal investigations that she believed were warranted I never said any of that my blog that never happened I am listing the crimes of police officers and FBI agents but I never ever said in my blog criminal investigations should be open she just put words in my mouth and she rewrote my blog for me put it in here as if it was my perception as if it was my words in the block she's not even quoting the blog properly. she's pretty words in my mouth she doesn't have quotation marks around this that's not what she should be doing. now Dr Kimberly Turner is calling my ex-husband former husband who says that who does that who calls their ex-husband former husband and what kind of a medical professional will call an ex-husband or an ex-wife an ex spouse a former husband that doesn't make any sense this looks hideous she's proving to the world that she's incompetent and she has no business evaluating anybody else's competency. I'm not sure but if I had to take a stab in the dark I would say that she's calling it my former husband because I'm page two she said that we are merely separated even though we're divorced and she referred to him as my current husband and claimed that we were still married that means I own everything he owns. I know that you're writing it into this competency assessment because you were going to seek a civil commitment using a rule 20.01 and you thought that that idiot rapist that killed his own parents and killed our children was going to be my conservatorship and take control of me and be my power of attorney so you decided to put in this competency assessment report that we're still married because you think that gives him power over me and you are wrong. nowhere in my blog does it say that my former husband or my ex-husband sued me. nowhere does it say that he did not sue me. this woman is so incompetent she cannot quote a blog properly he stated that he was going to try to sue child protective services for removing him from the family home I never said my ex-husband sued me nor did I say my former husband sued me what the heck did he sue me for. divorce when people are seeking a divorce it is not called being sued by your former spouse it's called divorce it's called divorce Court it is not considered you being sued this is the stupidest thing I've ever heard what planet is Dr Kimberly Turner from I cannot believe you said this hideously stupid thing when you go to divorce court it's not the same as being sued maybe that's the way it is in Australia maybe that's the way it is in England but here in America we don't call it being sued and once again you're putting words in my mouth and you're rewriting my block or whatever social media you claim to grab this from. she quoted my blog saying that I had made a statement to all of the members of the San Antonio fatherhood campaign about the fact that all of the crimes they are committing will never go away and on judgment Day this will be seen everything they ever did now in the statement that I made in the block when I was very angry was but it will all still be there when you go on to meet your maker look at how the doctor put her own ideas and her opinion in apprentice. God I believe this is very snarky this is very sarcastic and it's a bit on the nasty side nobody asked you what your opinion was about who are maker is and whether or not we believe that God is our maker I said your maker I did not interject whether or not it was God and I don't think it's necessary for a doctor to be sarcastic snarky and nasty in a competency assessment you just violated every ethic in the ethics book for code of conduct of medical examiners. when doctors are doing a competency assessment first of all they shouldn't be calling it an evaluation because this is not an evaluation and second of all I don't think that they should have such a nasty attitude being snarky sarcastic. when you read The sovereign book series what does it say about meeting your maker? why is this nasty doctor think that she has something that she can damn my character with being sarcastic snarky and nasty with this tone and a parentheses God I believe who is it that ask your opinion about who you think our maker is. why would you interject this into a quoted statement from my block you just put your own words in there and you decided that you were going to get snarky and snippy it kind of sounds like the woman that always says love me explain it to you slowly you've just entered the city we own and we own everybody in this city I don't know who we is honey but you no longer on any City and you don't have a place to live